In partnership with

Thanks to reader Fady who requested this topic!

As a former engineer who traded code sprints for cap tables, I often get asked how VCs really figure out if a tiny pre-seed startup is feasible.

In Big Tech, “feasible” meant can we build it?

In VC-land, it means should we build it, will anyone care, and can this scrappy team pull it off?

Evaluating an early-stage startup’s feasibility is a bit like debugging an empty code file – there’s not much to go on, so you rely on patterns, intuition, and a healthy dose of faith. Let’s break it down.

👥 Team: Betting on the Jockeys

VCs often say they bet on the jockey, not the horse – meaning the founding team is usually the most critical factor at pre-seed.

What we look for in teams:

  • Founder-Market Fit

    Do they have deep experience or a personal connection to the problem?

  • Execution Track Record

    Have they built anything before, even side projects or open-source tools?

  • Complementary Skills

    Tech + go-to-market coverage is ideal. Bonus points if they’re not all “CEO” types.

  • Resilience & Coachability

    Pivoting is common at this stage. Can they adapt?

  • Talent Magnetism

    Can they attract early believers (teammates, advisors, first customers)?

🧪 Example:

DripScript, a solo founder project that auto-wrote release notes using AI, had a janky demo — but the founder had real technical chops and user love.

StartEngine’s $30M Surge — Own a Piece Before June 26

StartEngine is the investing platform providing exposure to pre-IPO companies like OpenAI, Perplexity, and Databricks.

After doubling their revenues YoY in 2024 ($23M to $48M), StartEngine’s now tripled first quarter revenue YoY to a record $30M, based on its unaudited Q1 2025 financials. Now you can join 45K+ shareholders across all offerings before this round closes next month.

Reg A+ via StartEngine Crowdfunding, Inc. No BD/intermediary involved. Investment is speculative, illiquid & high risk. See OC and Risks on page.

💻 Tech & Product: Rocket Science or Hot Air?

This is where your friendly neighborhood ex-engineer-turned-VC squints at architecture diagrams and asks: “Wait, how does this actually work?”

What we check:

  • Prototype or MVP

    Even a rough demo shows capability.

  • Feasibility vs. Fantasy

    Are they using “AI” or just calling Google Translate?

  • Differentiation

    Is it just another clone or solving a niche pain?

  • Scalability & Technical Risk

    We like ambition, but not “requires a Nobel Prize” levels of technical risk.

  • IP or Unique Know-How

    Proprietary tech or deep domain knowledge both help.

🔍 Watch out for: slide decks full of buzzwords like “quantum-blockchain-powered NLP.” Seen it. Didn’t fund it.

📈 Market Signals: Traction, Tea Leaves, and Proof in the Pudding

Startups at this stage rarely have revenue, so we look for indicators.

Signals we love:

  • Early Traction

    • Waitlists

    • Pilot users

    • LOIs from potential customers

  • Engagement Over Vanity

    • 100 daily actives > 1,000 signups with no retention

  • Customer Feedback

    • Screenshots of Slack messages saying “where has this been all my life?” are 💯

  • Competitive Context

    • Some competition is a good sign. No competition? Red flag.

📊 Example:

GlitterPay had only 200 users, but parents & teens loved it, and the product had real stickiness. That made all the difference.

⏳ Timing: Too Early, Too Late, or Just Right?

Timing might be the most underestimated factor - and one of the most decisive.

How we assess it:

  • Trends & Enablers

    • Is this riding a wave? (e.g. AI in 2025, yes. VR dating apps, maybe not yet.)

  • Market Readiness

    • Do customers understand the product and want it now?

  • Goldilocks Zone

    • First = risky (you may need to create the market)

    • Tenth = tough (crowded field)

    • Early but not alone = just right

📉 Example:

SmartFridgeCo in 2018 made connected blenders. Market wasn’t ready. Similar ideas now? Much more feasible.

🧩 Putting It All Together

Feasibility =

  • Team

  • Tech

  • Market Signals

  • Timing

Even if one is weak, others can make up for it.

📚 Final Anecdote:

We backed a startup (let’s call it Project Apollo) doing AI-powered code review tools. Small user base, but fanatical engagement, killer team, perfect timing. It worked.

🎤 Parting Words

Pre-seed investing is half science, half gut instinct - and all about potential.

I’ve learned feasibility isn’t just about what can be built - it’s about what should be built, by whom, and when.

If you’re a founder, know that we’re reading your signals (even the tiny ones) and hoping they spell something big.

Until next time,

💻 SWEdonym

Prepare for your next business move with our International Hiring Guide

At Deel, we've simplified a world's worth of global hiring information. Our expert teams can help you navigate quick and compliant hiring in 150+ countries and so much more.

Reply

or to participate

Keep Reading

No posts found